Home Wealth Project
Extensive Research On How To Build Wealth From The Comfort Of Your Own Home.
4 New Aspects of Science that Could Make Surgical Technologists Obsolete
Nov 3rd
Mechanical engineering and robotic surgery hasn’t yet reached the level where it can completely replace trained and skilled doctors, surgeons and surgical technologists, but it has gotten off to a good start. There are machines and devices that have been developed in both the public and private sectors that can not only complete complex procedures without a surgeon being physically present in the operating room, but they have also come very close to becoming completely autonomous. Some of are so impressive that they are starting to make some science fiction films look more like documentaries than action epics from the mind of some coked-up sci-fi writer.
The Da Vinci Surgical System
This system is one of the first fully robotic surgical systems to enter the medical profession and hospitals all around the world including Johns Hopkins where it is used for heart procedures and Stanford where doctors use it primarily for female infertility treatments and operations. It still requires the use of a human surgeon to operate the machine and make the proper incisions and sutures, but it does so in a minimally invasive way and can provide a deeper look into a patient.
The Probulator from “Futurama”
This extremely invasive (in every sense of the word) device is used by the state to do complete physicals on “de-frostees” before they enter the year 3000. The device may not serve the same purpose as it’s real word counterpart, but it’s remote control station and robotic arms that perform the function in place of a doctor seem eerily similar.
The Swimming Digestive Camera
Patients with intestinal problems have to endure a very invasive procedure in which a camera is fed through their intestinal tract and if they’re lucky, it’s STARTS through their mouth. Some medical researchers at the Osaka Medical College of Western Japan developed a tiny motorized camera can be controlled remotely as it swims through a patient’s intestines to give doctors a way of see a patient’s malady without surgery or invasive camera tubing.
The C.M.D.F. from “Fantastic Voyage”
This classic 1966 science-fiction epic takes place entirely inside a comatose human body as a crew of medical surgeons and surgical technologists attempt to save a human life by miniaturizing themselves and entering the patients through the bloodstream. Of course, medicine has yet to develop the kind of technology that can shrink anything down to microscopic size, especially since most of our current efforts are dedicated to making parts of the male and female anatomy bigger and more noticeable.
RI-MAN
Robots, whether they are built in the real world or constructed just the benefit of literature or film, are always imagined and conceived for the benefit of mankind. This big, soft and cuddly creature built by Riken’s Bio Mimetic Control Research Center in Nagoya, Japan aims to serve the same function by not only helping to transport hospital patients comfortably and safely but it also does so by looking cute and familiar to make the patient feel more at ease in their time of suffering.
Adam from the original “Outer Limits” episode “I, Robot”
The robot in this story was also raised not only to use its superhuman strength to serve mankind, but also to learn how to become a member of it in order to fulfill its creator’s ultimate goal. Unfortunately, the creator suffers a fatal accident in the doctor’s lab and the robot is accused of murdering him and as it is set off to its final execution, it saves the life of a small girl and destroys itself in the process. Hell, most humans couldn’t be programmed to do that.
Robosurgeon
It often seems that the ultimate goal of medical robotics is to completely replace the human element from the most highly trained physician down to the orderly who cleans up after the patient. The “Robosurgeon” could be the first step to that unthinkable goal. A working model of the robot operated on a 34-year-old man suffering from atrial fibrillation in Milan, Italy without any control or instruction from a medical doctor as physicians from around the world monitored its progress through a private video feed.
2-1B from “The Empire Strikes Back”
This robot from the final scene of the fifth chronological film in the “Star Wars” series is not only a very knowledgeable doctor and surgeon, but he actually has a very friendly bedside manner with his patients and a deep dedication to his profession. According to his “Star Wars Wookiepedia” page, it’s this very dedication and his alliance with the Rebellion that convinced Luke to insist that he work on his injured arm after his infamous first battle with Darth Vader.
View full post on Business Pundit
9 Ways Christianity Battles Science
Oct 29th
Science and Religion… here are two things that do not go together like birds of a feather, or peas in a pod, or pork chops in applesauce. But the two have to live together one way or another seeing as the world is technologically and scientifically developing at nearly the speed of light while the Light of Christ still illuminates the Bible Belt and beyond with the same intensity as ever. The two world views are bound to clash on most of the issues, but perhaps there is some common ground somewhere. Or maybe not. Here are some of the ways Christians try to resist the proven facts of science.
Evolution
One way in which Christian apologists try most fervently to undermine the progress of scientific knowledge is in the field of evolution. After all, the theory of evolution is as central to our scientific understanding of the world as the Creation story is to Christian life today. According to the Bible, the world was created in six days, God resting on the seventh. Imagine God as an old man in a basement assembling a model train kit. Animals and plants and people were set down meticulously in their finalized forms.
Biologists have a different take. According to their wacky theory, life actually began in a heap of sludge as simple cell units developed and slowly evolved towards complexity, developing characteristics which would serve the organisms in their specific environments. To further combat this, Christians came up with the backwards idea of Intelligent Design, in which God actually made flowers look sexy to bees and so on.
Quite frankly both of these scenarios are somewhat hard to wrap the mind around but don’t forget that Evolution is backed up by countless experiments and fossil records. Creationism is backed up by… Creationists. They may not have the hard evidence but boy do they have volume.
Dinosaurs
If we’re going to talk evolution then we have to mention dinosaurs. We have their bones and we’ve spent a lot of time assembling them for the benefit of countless field trips to the Natural History Museum. Who were these beasts and what role do they play in human history?
Paleontologists like Ross Geller from “Friends” will tell you that dinosaurs are an extinct species that roamed our planet hundreds of millions of years ago. Christian fundamentalists don’t much care for this theory, or for that slick, Godless Ross character espousing it. After all, it really throws a stick in the spokes of that Creation in a week idea.
That’s why the fundies came up with what some like to call the Flintstone theory. They argue that dinosaurs were placed on this earth, fully formed, along with the other animals God created, but then they died for some reason. At the Creation Museum in Kentucky one can see, in full Flintstones style, dinosaurs and humans hanging around the ancient world together and having a dandy time of it.
Others have gone for a more far-fetched explanation, reporting that dinosaur bones are props that God made and buried in the ground to test human faith. Pretty sneaky, Lord!
Age of the World
The age of the world is 4.5 billion years old according to the leading scientific minds. We suspect this age based on radiometric age dating of lunar and meteorite materials found on our planet and beyond. Sure there’s no timer glued onto the North Pole so we can’t be 100% sure, but we have a theory with some solid foundations. The Christians have their theory as well, but the foundations are a little more shaky.
If we look at the Bible as a historical document, this world of ours is practically a newborn. Creation is generally estimated by these “scholars” to be about 20,000 years in progress and the Earth itself at about 6,000.
The humongous discrepancy in these ages (4.5 billion and 6,000) makes sense. The parts fit together. Evolution, a long and complex process, needs some time to happen. Creationism only needs a moment, the rest of those 6,000 years being spent hanging out with pterodactyls, building pyramids, writing boring letters to the Corinthians and so on.
Monogamy Vs. Free Love
Christians hate sex. No, that’s an oversimplification. They love sex, one has to assume, but you’ve got to play by the rules of monogamy. To many of us modern-minded folk today, marriage is an archaic social structure used to promote family and societal welfare. To Christians, marriage is an ontological fact, a natural behavior for human beings. To deviate from it means that not only are you failing ethically, but you are perverting a natural order.
Science tells a different story. Even if we avow marriage as a society, the data shows that it’s probably not all too natural for us. Some animals mate for life… but usually not very smart ones. Flightless birds with pea-sized brains are known to mate for life, but primates prefer to get around.
Bonobo monkeys, for example, have sex with just about every other Bonobo they ever meet. They engage in recreational sex, stress-release stress, conflict-resolution sex, oral sex and, um, solo-sex. Also, the Bible is a made-up, man-written fiction.
Stem Cells
Stem Cells, pardon the religious parlance, are something of a real life miracle. To define them broadly, Stem Cells are the seeds that have the potential to become a myriad other kinds of specialized cells. They can take the form of almost any other kind of cell and thus present a unique medical and scientific opportunity. The stem cells can be used to cure diseases such as diabetes, cardiac diseases, certain cancers and more.
Why would anyone in their right mind, let alone Jesus, oppose such a miracle treatment? Because it represents the ultimate hubris of course! Also because these stem cells have in the past been harvested from discarded, unwanted fetuses. It’s easy to understand how this would make a few people uncomfortable, especially the Bible thumpers, who have begun to claim that fetuses will not only be killed but harvested in the name of stem cells.
Homosexuality
Homosexuality, Biblically speaking, might be a sin. But is it really so bad? Yes, God commands mankind to not have sex with people of the same sex, but if you read that section carefully it also says no shrimp, no multi-fabric blends in our clothing, and no cheeseburgers. Despite this Christians don’t generally avoid shellfish, blended garments or McDonald’s. Yet the gay thing, they’ve latched on to.
Science tells us that sexual orientation is not a choice. While the cause of sexual orientation is unclear, what is clear is that it’s set in stone from a pretty early age and can’t really be changed with drugs, therapy or prayer.
Still, Christians are quick to point out that homosexuality represents a ‘corruption of nature’ and a moral failing to boot. The result has been that religious organizations funnel millions and millions of dollars to causes that systematically rob gays and lesbians of their rights. Meanwhile, the shrimp purveyors go unpunished!
Natural Disaster
Christian Fundamentalists, while preaching brotherhood and love, can have a surprising amount of bloodlust. After any natural disaster, religious figures are quick to blame the event on some moral failing of the people most direly affected.
This, most likely, comes from the story of Noah and his arc. God causes a flood to punish the world for its sins. At the end of the story, however, God mentions that he will never pull some shit like that again. Also, after its pointed out by Abraham, God admits that destroying whole cities over the sins of a few residents is just not ok. This comes from the story of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Still, Hurricane Irene was blamed on New York’s new gay marriage legislation. Katrina was also blamed on the gays. Apparently gay people are the cause of all major weather catastrophes.
End of the World
If there is one thing that religious people and members of the scientific community agree on, it’s the apocalypse. Listen to a fundamentalist preacher on the subject and then listen to Al Gore and you’ll find some startling similarities. The end is near. The end will be hot and full of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.
But the messages are not identical. While Al Gore bases his theories on research and tries to impart on people that we can change our ways and avoid this disaster, religious people have no such hope. Many of them look forward hungrily to the end of the world. Since the beginning of Christianity there have been nuts on the street claiming that the apocalypse is near.
This is probably because the apocalypse and the subsequent judgment will at last provide Christian fundamentalists with an affirmation that their beliefs are correct. Accordingly they look forward to the day with drooling mouths, evidenced by the popularity of the Evangelist novel series “Left Behind,” about the rapture and the torments of the poor sinners who are… left behind. It’s been made into a video game filled with hellfire and violence, and it is approved by priests around the country.
The Right to Die
One arena in which the religion vs science debate rages regards the right to death. Time after time the media is filled with stories of individuals on life support, completely brain-dead but, with the aid of machinery, still breathing and living… technically.
Often times the loved ones of these individuals want to pull the plug, reasoning that they need closure and that there is no longer anything of their loved one left inside the braindead body. But religious fanatics oppose this with astonishing anger and resentment.
After all, to pull the plug is to play God, right? Well, maybe… but maybe the whole life support machine system is playing God — without the help of the machine, these people would surely have died much sooner. And why is it so bad to play God anyways? What would Jesus Do, after all?
View full post on Business Pundit
9 Ways Christianity Battles Science
Oct 29th
Science and Religion… here are two things that do not go together like birds of a feather, or peas in a pod, or pork chops in applesauce. But the two have to live together one way or another seeing as the world is technologically and scientifically developing at nearly the speed of light while the Light of Christ still illuminates the Bible Belt and beyond with the same intensity as ever. The two world views are bound to clash on most of the issues, but perhaps there is some common ground somewhere. Or maybe not. Here are some of the ways Christians try to resist the proven facts of science.
Evolution
One way in which Christian apologists try most fervently to undermine the progress of scientific knowledge is in the field of evolution. After all, the theory of evolution is as central to our scientific understanding of the world as the Creation story is to Christian life today. According to the Bible, the world was created in six days, God resting on the seventh. Imagine God as an old man in a basement assembling a model train kit. Animals and plants and people were set down meticulously in their finalized forms.
Biologists have a different take. According to their wacky theory, life actually began in a heap of sludge as simple cell units developed and slowly evolved towards complexity, developing characteristics which would serve the organisms in their specific environments. To further combat this, Christians came up with the backwards idea of Intelligent Design, in which God actually made flowers look sexy to bees and so on.
Quite frankly both of these scenarios are somewhat hard to wrap the mind around but don’t forget that Evolution is backed up by countless experiments and fossil records. Creationism is backed up by… Creationists. They may not have the hard evidence but boy do they have volume.
Dinosaurs
If we’re going to talk evolution then we have to mention dinosaurs. We have their bones and we’ve spent a lot of time assembling them for the benefit of countless field trips to the Natural History Museum. Who were these beasts and what role do they play in human history?
Paleontologists like Ross Geller from “Friends” will tell you that dinosaurs are an extinct species that roamed our planet hundreds of millions of years ago. Christian fundamentalists don’t much care for this theory, or for that slick, Godless Ross character espousing it. After all, it really throws a stick in the spokes of that Creation in a week idea.
That’s why the fundies came up with what some like to call the Flintstone theory. They argue that dinosaurs were placed on this earth, fully formed, along with the other animals God created, but then they died for some reason. At the Creation Museum in Kentucky one can see, in full Flintstones style, dinosaurs and humans hanging around the ancient world together and having a dandy time of it.
Others have gone for a more far-fetched explanation, reporting that dinosaur bones are props that God made and buried in the ground to test human faith. Pretty sneaky, Lord!
Age of the World
The age of the world is 4.5 billion years old according to the leading scientific minds. We suspect this age based on radiometric age dating of lunar and meteorite materials found on our planet and beyond. Sure there’s no timer glued onto the North Pole so we can’t be 100% sure, but we have a theory with some solid foundations. The Christians have their theory as well, but the foundations are a little more shaky.
If we look at the Bible as a historical document, this world of ours is practically a newborn. Creation is generally estimated by these “scholars” to be about 20,000 years in progress and the Earth itself at about 6,000.
The humongous discrepancy in these ages (4.5 billion and 6,000) makes sense. The parts fit together. Evolution, a long and complex process, needs some time to happen. Creationism only needs a moment, the rest of those 6,000 years being spent hanging out with pterodactyls, building pyramids, writing boring letters to the Corinthians and so on.
Monogamy Vs. Free Love
Christians hate sex. No, that’s an oversimplification. They love sex, one has to assume, but you’ve got to play by the rules of monogamy. To many of us modern-minded folk today, marriage is an archaic social structure used to promote family and societal welfare. To Christians, marriage is an ontological fact, a natural behavior for human beings. To deviate from it means that not only are you failing ethically, but you are perverting a natural order.
Science tells a different story. Even if we avow marriage as a society, the data shows that it’s probably not all too natural for us. Some animals mate for life… but usually not very smart ones. Flightless birds with pea-sized brains are known to mate for life, but primates prefer to get around.
Bonobo monkeys, for example, have sex with just about every other Bonobo they ever meet. They engage in recreational sex, stress-release stress, conflict-resolution sex, oral sex and, um, solo-sex. Also, the Bible is a made-up, man-written fiction.
Stem Cells
Stem Cells, pardon the religious parlance, are something of a real life miracle. To define them broadly, Stem Cells are the seeds that have the potential to become a myriad other kinds of specialized cells. They can take the form of almost any other kind of cell and thus present a unique medical and scientific opportunity. The stem cells can be used to cure diseases such as diabetes, cardiac diseases, certain cancers and more.
Why would anyone in their right mind, let alone Jesus, oppose such a miracle treatment? Because it represents the ultimate hubris of course! Also because these stem cells have in the past been harvested from discarded, unwanted fetuses. It’s easy to understand how this would make a few people uncomfortable, especially the Bible thumpers, who have begun to claim that fetuses will not only be killed but harvested in the name of stem cells.
Homosexuality
Homosexuality, Biblically speaking, might be a sin. But is it really so bad? Yes, God commands mankind to not have sex with people of the same sex, but if you read that section carefully it also says no shrimp, no multi-fabric blends in our clothing, and no cheeseburgers. Despite this Christians don’t generally avoid shellfish, blended garments or McDonald’s. Yet the gay thing, they’ve latched on to.
Science tells us that sexual orientation is not a choice. While the cause of sexual orientation is unclear, what is clear is that it’s set in stone from a pretty early age and can’t really be changed with drugs, therapy or prayer.
Still, Christians are quick to point out that homosexuality represents a ‘corruption of nature’ and a moral failing to boot. The result has been that religious organizations funnel millions and millions of dollars to causes that systematically rob gays and lesbians of their rights. Meanwhile, the shrimp purveyors go unpunished!
Natural Disaster
Christian Fundamentalists, while preaching brotherhood and love, can have a surprising amount of bloodlust. After any natural disaster, religious figures are quick to blame the event on some moral failing of the people most direly affected.
This, most likely, comes from the story of Noah and his arc. God causes a flood to punish the world for its sins. At the end of the story, however, God mentions that he will never pull some shit like that again. Also, after its pointed out by Abraham, God admits that destroying whole cities over the sins of a few residents is just not ok. This comes from the story of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Still, Hurricane Irene was blamed on New York’s new gay marriage legislation. Katrina was also blamed on the gays. Apparently gay people are the cause of all major weather catastrophes.
End of the World
If there is one thing that religious people and members of the scientific community agree on, it’s the apocalypse. Listen to a fundamentalist preacher on the subject and then listen to Al Gore and you’ll find some startling similarities. The end is near. The end will be hot and full of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.
But the messages are not identical. While Al Gore bases his theories on research and tries to impart on people that we can change our ways and avoid this disaster, religious people have no such hope. Many of them look forward hungrily to the end of the world. Since the beginning of Christianity there have been nuts on the street claiming that the apocalypse is near.
This is probably because the apocalypse and the subsequent judgment will at last provide Christian fundamentalists with an affirmation that their beliefs are correct. Accordingly they look forward to the day with drooling mouths, evidenced by the popularity of the Evangelist novel series “Left Behind,” about the rapture and the torments of the poor sinners who are… left behind. It’s been made into a video game filled with hellfire and violence, and it is approved by priests around the country.
The Right to Die
One arena in which the religion vs science debate rages regards the right to death. Time after time the media is filled with stories of individuals on life support, completely brain-dead but, with the aid of machinery, still breathing and living… technically.
Often times the loved ones of these individuals want to pull the plug, reasoning that they need closure and that there is no longer anything of their loved one left inside the braindead body. But religious fanatics oppose this with astonishing anger and resentment.
After all, to pull the plug is to play God, right? Well, maybe… but maybe the whole life support machine system is playing God — without the help of the machine, these people would surely have died much sooner. And why is it so bad to play God anyways? What would Jesus Do, after all?
View full post on Business Pundit
The Science Of Abundant Life.
Oct 2nd
The Science of Getting Rich by Wallace D. Wattles together with Wallace D. Wattles’ The Science of Being Well, The Science of Being Great, How to Promote Yourself, The New Science of Living and Healing, and Hell-fire Harrison!
The Science Of Abundant Life.
Inspired Science of Getting Rich
Sep 3rd
Master Law of Attraction and the Science of Getting Rich. Extensive program teaches you how to systematically follow the teachings of Wallace Wattles. 17 study audios, pdf study guides, ebook, audio book, bonus teleseminar. Strong reviews and low refunds.
Inspired Science of Getting Rich
Science Based Angular Cheilitis Treatment-Easy Promotion
Apr 20th
Complete site makeover, new copy, easier conversions. Current testing returns 1 sale in 26 hops. Easy promotion, cheap Ppc, loads of converting keywords, low refunds. Tools: http://www.angularcheilitis-cure.com/affiliate/pro motion.php
Science Based Angular Cheilitis Treatment-Easy Promotion
Science Of Being Secrets
Feb 25th
Get the complete life-changing Fersen Trilogy! Science of Being, Science of Being: 27 Lessons, and Is There A God?, all scans from the original works. The Baron Eugene Fersen was the definitive teacher on the law of attraction. Discover his secrets today.
Science Of Being Secrets
40 Years After Peter Principle, Promotions Still Aren’t a Science
Nov 10th
Image: Despair, Inc.
In 2008, Business Pundit posted an article outlining the classic “Peter Principle.” The Peter Principle says that in hierarchical organizations, workers will be promoted to their level of incompetence.
In essence, the Peter Principle lends credence to everyone’s niggling suspicion that management doesn’t know what they’re doing. According to the principle, promoting someone based on outstanding work has only marginal returns.
If your corporate scheme rewards good employees with promotions to another position, those employees will rise through the ranks until they reach a job at which they max out their level of competence. At that point, they can’t be promoted anymore, because they’re too incompetent to keep climbing the ladder. Those employees who haven’t yet reached their level of incompetence are the ones actually doing all the work.
When Do Promotions Make Sense?
Dr. Lawrence J. Peter and Raymond Hull first popularized the Peter Principle in their classic book The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong nearly forty years ago. The book’s most recent reissue was last year. Meanwhile, several researchers have continued to probe within organizational structures, attempting to find a solution to Dr. Peter’s dilemma.
The most recent research, published last year and awarded the Ig Nobel Prize in management science in September, was conducted by three Italian scientists from the University of Catania Sicily. By using computational models, the researchers determined that the most efficient promotion scheme was a random one.
The Italian team of researchers concluded their findings, published as “The Peter Principle Revisited: A Computational Study,” by noting:
“…we obtained the counterintuitive result that the best strategies for improving, or at least for not diminishing, the efficiency of an organization, when one ignores the actual mechanism of competence transmission, are those of promoting an agent at random or of randomly alternating the promotion of the best and the worst members.”
If random promotions give managers the shivers, researchers have posited other solutions over the years. One is to delay a promotion until a worker demonstrates the skills necessary to succeed in the higher position. Another strategy is simply rewarding outstanding work with simply a higher salary. A third, while more radical, is also timely: More IT companies are making use of contractor work, which avoids incompetence by taking on short-term employees. Those contracts can easily be terminated if workers demonstrate ineptitude.
In response to the research conducted by the Italian team, Phedon Nicolaides, a professor at the European Institute of Public Administration in Maastricht, Netherlands, noted that while the research is interesting, it isn’t practical, simply because promoting the worst members of an organization randomly would decrease morale and breed resentment among other members of the organization.
Nicolaides takes into account office politics, and how nepotism can poison an organizational structure. In a recent Cyprus Mail article, Nicolaides notes:
“Instead of promoting staff randomly, it should be the selectors and evaluators that should be identified through lottery from a larger pool of candidates. If their names are drawn randomly, say, the day before any hiring or promotion assessment, it will be very difficult for any political party to influence the outcome. The outcome should be fairer at hardly any additional bureaucracy.”
This guest post is contributed by Kate Willson, who writes on the topics of top online colleges. She welcomes your comments at her email Id: katewillson2 (AT) gmail (DOT) com.
View full post on Business Pundit
Twitter hacked, sending users to third-party sites – Technology & science – Security
Sep 21st
| The Twitter social media site has been hacked, impacting thousands of users of the popular microblogging site. According to Mashable, the bug… |
|
||||
View full post on Home Wealth Project Riot!
